Chapter 13. Operator Overloading: Doing It Right
There are some things that I kind of feel torn about, like operator overloading. I left out operator overloading as a fairly personal choice because I had seen too many people abuse it in C++.1
James Gosling, Creator of Java
Operator overloading allows user-defined objects to interoperate with infix operators such as +
and |
or unary operators like -
and ~
. More generally, function invocation (()
), attribute access (.
), and item access/slicing ([]
) are also operators in Python, but this chapter covers unary and infix operators.
In “Emulating Numeric Types” (Chapter 1) we saw some trivial implementations of operators in a bare bones Vector
class. The __add__
and __mul__
methods in Example 1-2 were written to show how special methods support operator overloading, but there are subtle problems in their implementations that we overlooked. Also, in Example 9-2, we noted that the Vector2d.__eq__
method considers this to be True
: Vector(3, 4) == [3, 4]
—which may or not make sense. We will address those matters in this chapter.
In the following sections, we will cover:
-
How Python supports infix operators with operands of different types
-
Using duck typing or explicit type checks to deal with operands of various types
-
How an infix operator method should signal it cannot handle an operand
-
The special behavior of the rich comparison operators (e.g.,
==
,>
,<=
, etc.) -
The default handling of augmented assignment operators, like
Get Fluent Python now with the O’Reilly learning platform.
O’Reilly members experience books, live events, courses curated by job role, and more from O’Reilly and nearly 200 top publishers.