The errata list is a list of errors and their corrections that were found after the product was released.
The following errata were submitted by our customers and have not yet been approved or disproved by the author or editor. They solely represent the opinion of the customer.
Color Key: Serious technical mistake Minor technical mistake Language or formatting error Typo Question Note Update
| Version |
Location |
Description |
Submitted by |
Date submitted |
| Other Digital Version |
N/A |
I have written 145 notes/errata (all of which aren't in the errata page) for the book and it would be impractical and quite painful (both for me and for the authors) to write them one by one here.
And since I read the Kindle edition, I took advantage of its sharing-notes feature which shows notes/errata together with the highlighted relevant text and even includes the page number.
I just sent these errata/notes to both `booktech@oreilly.com` and `bookquestions@oreilly.com` and expect (and look forward to) some going back and forth.
I've tried more than a dozen programming languages over the years and probably only borrowing/lifetimes are new concepts to me. Most notes/errata are from an outsider perspective as I didn't start using Rust when I was reading the book.
However, I have now about 10days of Rust experience and have been using it productively. Still notes/errata haven't changed much as I edited/reviewed them as most points are quite intuitive from a programming and common-sense perspective.
Looking forward to hearing from you,
|
Abdullah Alansari |
Oct 04, 2021 |