Errata for MCSA/MCSE Self-Paced Training Kit (Exam 70-210): Microsoft® Windows® 2000 Professional
Submit your own errata for this product.
The errata list is a list of errors and their corrections that were found after the product was released. If the error was corrected in a later version or reprint the date of the correction will be displayed in the column titled "Date Corrected".
The following errata were submitted by our customers and approved as valid errors by the author or editor.
Color Key: Serious Technical Mistake Minor Technical Mistake Language or formatting error Typo Question Note Update
| Version |
Location |
Description |
Submitted By |
Date Submitted |
Date Corrected |
| Printed |
Page 27
|
32 MB Should Be 64 MB In Figure 2.1
On page 27, in Figure 2.1, in the "Memory"
box,Change:"32 MB"To:"64 MB"
|
Microsoft Press |
May 06, 2010 |
|
| Printed |
Page 82
|
Maximum Monitors Should Be 9
In the first bullet point in the Using Multiple Displays
section,Change:"Use of multiple displays extends the desktop
across a maximum of 10 monitors."To:"Use of multiple displays
extends the desktop across a maximum of 9 additional monitors."
|
Microsoft Press |
Jul 13, 2010 |
|
| Printed |
Page 87
|
Maximum Monitors Should Be 9
On page 87, in the second paragraph,Change:"...with
up to a maximum of 10 additional monitors,..."To:"...with up to
a maximum of 9 additional monitors,..."
|
Microsoft Press |
May 06, 2010 |
|
| Printed |
Page 348
|
Account~1 Should Be Accoun~1
On page 348 in the paragraph just before the Practice: Applied Permissions section,Change:"a Windows 2000 folder named Accountants Database would appear as
Account~1 on client computers running MS-DOS, Windows 3.x, and Windows for Workgroups."To:"a Windows 2000 folder named Accountants Database would appear as
Accoun~1 on client computers running MS-DOS, Windows 3.x, and Windows for Workgroups."
|
Microsoft Press |
Jul 13, 2010 |
|
| Printed |
Page 354
|
Correction To Table 15.2
On page 354, in Table 15.2, in the second paragraph under
Purpose,Remove:"Windows 2000 also automatically shares CD-ROM
drives and creates the share name by appending the dollar sign to the CD-ROM
drive letter."
|
Microsoft Press |
May 06, 2010 |
|
| Printed |
Page 437 & 915
|
Increase Should Be Decrease
On page 437 in the last sentence of Review Question 3, and on
page 915 where the sentence is repeated,Change:"How can you
increase disk access time for the computer?"To:"How can you
decrease disk access time for the computer?"
|
Microsoft Press |
Jul 13, 2010 |
|
| Printed |
Page 517
|
Correction To Figure 22.3
On page 517, in figure 22.3, the label "multi(0)" immediately
above the c: partition should read "rdisk(0)".
|
Microsoft Press |
May 06, 2010 |
|
| Printed |
Page 553
|
Correction to Generating Hardware Compatibility Report
On page 553, under "Generating a Hardware Compatibility Report", there is a reference to the use of Windows 2000 Compatibility tool (Chkupgrd.exe ). The Windows 2000 Compatibility tool is no longer availalble.
|
Microsoft Press |
Jul 13, 2010 |
|
| Printed |
Page 596
|
Remove First Practice 2
On page 596, please remove the first "Practice 2", as the tool Windows 200 Readiness Analyzer is no longer availalble.
|
Microsoft Press |
May 06, 2010 |
|
| Printed |
Page 601
|
Correction To Windows 2000 Readiness Analyzer Program.
On page 601, in the second paragraph, it states that "the Hardware and Software Compatibility page contans the Windows 2000 Readiness Analyzer program."
The Windows 2000 Compatibility tool is no longer availalble .
|
Microsoft Press |
Jul 13, 2010 |
|
| Printed |
Page 624
|
Incorrect Statement About Windows 2000 Service Pack
On page 624,Change: "If, after applying the service
pack, you add any services or drivers to the local installation, you must
reapply the service pack. To avoid manual service pack reapplication, type
update -s: distribution_folder (where distribution_folder is the location
containing the operating system files) to slipstream a distribution point. Then
use the distribution point rather than the Windows 2000 Professional
installation CD-ROM to add services or drivers to the local
installation."To:"In earlier versions of Windows, if you applied
a service pack to your computer, each time you changed the system state by
adding or removing components, you had to reapply any service packs. Windows
2000 automatically recognizes that a service pack has been applied to the
system and which files have been replaced or updated. Whenever you add or
remove components from a computer running Windows 2000, the system copies the
required files from either the Windows 2000 installation files or from the
service pack install location, so you don't have to reapply the service
pack."
|
Microsoft Press |
May 06, 2010 |
|
| Printed |
Page 648
|
Write Should Be Change
On page 648, in the second paragraph,
Change:
"Share permissions are Full Control, Read, and Write."
To:
"Share permissions are Full Control, Read, and Change."
|
Microsoft Press |
Jul 13, 2010 |
|
| Printed |
Page 669
|
Disk Administrator Should Be Disk Management
On page 75, in the second paragraph,Change:"Disk
Administrator"To:"Disk Management"
|
Microsoft Press |
May 06, 2010 |
|
| Printed |
Page 725
|
Correction To Question 70-210.04.01.002
On page 725, in question
70-210.04.01.002,Change:"Which command-line
utility..."To:"Which utility..."
|
Microsoft Press |
May 06, 2010 |
|
| Printed |
Page 730-731
|
Disk Defragmenter Cannot Be Scheduled
Questions 70-210.04.02.003 and 70-210.04.02.004, on pages
730-731, propose using Scheduled Tasks to schedule the running of Disk
Defragmenter. Disk Defragmenter cannot be scheduled. On page
731,Change answer D of both questions to:"D. Disk
defragmentation does not occur at all."
|
Microsoft Press |
Jul 13, 2010 |
|
| Printed |
Page 733-734
|
Disk Defragmenter Cannot Be Scheduled
Questions 70-210.04.02.003 and 70-210.04.02.004, on pages 733-734,
propose using Scheduled Tasks to schedule the running of Disk Defragmenter.
Disk Defragmenter cannot be scheduled. On pages 733-731,Change the
explanation for question both questions to:"Correct Answer: DA.
Incorrect: see explanation for D.B. Incorrect: see explanation for
D.C. Incorrect: see explanation for D.D. Correct: Windows 2000 Disk
Defragmenter cannot be scheduled."
|
Microsoft Press |
Jul 13, 2010 |
|
| Printed |
Page 921
|
32 MB Should Be 64 MB In Question 5
On page 921, in the answer to question 5, it is incorrectly stated
that Windows 2000 Professional requires at least 32 MB of memory.This
should read at least 64 MB of memory.
|
Microsoft Press |
May 06, 2010 |
|
| Printed |
Page 978
|
Incorrect page number for nbtstat command entry in index
On page 978, the entry for the nbtstat command in the index reads:
"nbtstat command, 658"
It should read:
"nbtstat command, 162"Microsoft Press is committed to providing informative and accurate
books. All comments and corrections listed above are ready for inclusion in
future printings of this book. If you have a later printing of this book, it
may already contain most or all of the above
corrections.
|
Microsoft Press |
Jul 13, 2010 |
|
|