The errata list is a list of errors and their corrections that were found after the product was released. If the error was corrected in a later version or reprint the date of the correction will be displayed in the column titled "Date Corrected".
The following errata were submitted by our customers and approved as valid errors by the author or editor.
| Version |
Location |
Description |
Submitted By |
Date Submitted |
Date Corrected |
| Printed |
Page 13
|
WAS:
To use the wchar_t type and related facilities,
NOW READS:
To use facilities related to the wchar_t type,
|
Anonymous |
|
Oct 01, 2003 |
| Printed |
Page 13
|
WAS:
To use the wchar_t type and related facilities,
NOW READS:
To use facilities related to the wchar_t type,
|
Anonymous |
|
Oct 01, 2003 |
| Printed |
Page 18
The for-loop will not compile (using g++) unless you define an operator++ for the enum |
It should be:
SpectrumColor operator++(SpectrumColor &s, int dummy)
{
return s = (s >= Violet) ? Red : SpectrumColor(s + 1);
}
|
Anonymous |
|
Sep 01, 2007 |
| Printed |
Page 18
The for-loop will not compile (using g++) unless you define an operator++ for the enum |
It should be:
SpectrumColor operator++(SpectrumColor &s, int dummy)
{
return s = (s >= Violet) ? Red : SpectrumColor(s + 1);
}
|
Anonymous |
|
Sep 01, 2007 |
| Printed |
Page 21
|
In the last sentence under "Passing arrays to functions," two instances of "int" NOW CHANGED to
"double" in both places that it appears.
|
Anonymous |
|
Oct 01, 2003 |
| Printed |
Page 21
|
In the last sentence under "Passing arrays to functions," two instances of "int" NOW CHANGED to
"double" in both places that it appears.
|
Anonymous |
|
Oct 01, 2003 |
| Printed |
Page 26
bottom |
the declaration -
X objptr = new X;
NOW READS:
X *objptr = new X;
|
Anonymous |
|
Oct 01, 2003 |
| Printed |
Page 26
bottom |
the declaration -
X objptr = new X;
NOW READS:
X *objptr = new X;
|
Anonymous |
|
Oct 01, 2003 |
| Printed |
Page 33
Reserved Words |
"end_eq"
NOW READS:
"and_eq"
|
Anonymous |
|
Oct 01, 2003 |
| Printed |
Page 33
Reserved Words |
"end_eq"
NOW READS:
"and_eq"
|
Anonymous |
|
Oct 01, 2003 |
| Printed |
Page 35
Table 4 |
A horizontal line was missing after *_cast
to separate it from the next precedence level
This HAS BEEN CORRECTED.
|
Anonymous |
|
Mar 01, 2006 |
| Printed |
Page 35
Table 4 |
A horizontal line was missing after *_cast
to separate it from the next precedence level
This HAS BEEN CORRECTED.
|
Anonymous |
|
Mar 01, 2006 |
| Printed |
Page 40
Logical NOT |
The result of the logical NOT operator is an int.
NOW READS:
The result of the logical NOT operator is a bool.
|
Anonymous |
|
Oct 01, 2003 |
| Printed |
Page 40
|
Under "Bitwise NOT,":
This assigns 0xFF back into bits.
NOW READS:
This assigns 0xFF back into bits, assuming a character is eight bits.
|
Anonymous |
|
Oct 01, 2003 |
| Printed |
Page 40
Logical NOT |
The result of the logical NOT operator is an int.
NOW READS:
The result of the logical NOT operator is a bool.
|
Anonymous |
|
Oct 01, 2003 |
| Printed |
Page 40
|
Under "Bitwise NOT,":
This assigns 0xFF back into bits.
NOW READS:
This assigns 0xFF back into bits, assuming a character is eight bits.
|
Anonymous |
|
Oct 01, 2003 |
| Printed |
Page 42
middle |
the declaration -
X objptr = new X;
NOW READS:
X *objptr = new X;
|
Anonymous |
|
Oct 01, 2003 |
| Printed |
Page 42
middle |
the declaration -
X objptr = new X;
NOW READS:
X *objptr = new X;
|
Anonymous |
|
Oct 01, 2003 |
| Printed |
Page 43
|
Under "Relational," the last sentence NOW READS:
The result of using a relational operator is a bool.
|
Anonymous |
|
Oct 01, 2003 |
| Printed |
Page 43
|
Under "Relational," "yielding 1" HAS BEEN CHANGED to "yielding true" while "and 0" HAS BEEN CHANGED to
"and false."
***Reported as page 44, is actually on page 41****
|
Anonymous |
|
Oct 01, 2003 |
| Printed |
Page 43
Relational section; heading "<, <=>, >=, ==, !=" |
NOW READS:
"<, <=, >, >=, ==, !="
|
Anonymous |
|
Oct 01, 2003 |
| Printed |
Page 43
|
Under "Relational," the last sentence NOW READS:
The result of using a relational operator is a bool.
|
Anonymous |
|
Oct 01, 2003 |
| Printed |
Page 43
|
Under "Relational," "yielding 1" HAS BEEN CHANGED to "yielding true" while "and 0" HAS BEEN CHANGED to
"and false."
***Reported as page 44, is actually on page 41****
|
Anonymous |
|
Oct 01, 2003 |
| Printed |
Page 43
Relational section; heading "<, <=>, >=, ==, !=" |
NOW READS:
"<, <=, >, >=, ==, !="
|
Anonymous |
|
Oct 01, 2003 |
| Printed |
Page 44
|
Under "Logical NOT," the last sentence NOW READS:
The result of the logical NOT operator is a bool.
***Reported as page 44, is actually on page 40***
|
Anonymous |
|
Oct 01, 2003 |
| Printed |
Page 44
|
Under "Logical NOT," "yields 0" HAS BEEN CHANGED to "yields false" while "and 1" HAS BEEN CHANGED to "and
true."
|
Anonymous |
|
Oct 01, 2003 |
| Printed |
Page 44
|
Under "Logical AND and OR," all occurrences of "yields 1" HAVE BEEN CHANGED to "yields
true" and all occurrences of "yields 0" HAVE BEEN CHANGED to "yields false."
|
Anonymous |
|
Oct 01, 2003 |
| Printed |
Page 44
|
Under "Logical NOT," the last sentence NOW READS:
The result of the logical NOT operator is a bool.
***Reported as page 44, is actually on page 40***
|
Anonymous |
|
Oct 01, 2003 |
| Printed |
Page 44
|
Under "Logical NOT," "yields 0" HAS BEEN CHANGED to "yields false" while "and 1" HAS BEEN CHANGED to "and
true."
|
Anonymous |
|
Oct 01, 2003 |
| Printed |
Page 44
|
Under "Logical AND and OR," all occurrences of "yields 1" HAVE BEEN CHANGED to "yields
true" and all occurrences of "yields 0" HAVE BEEN CHANGED to "yields false."
|
Anonymous |
|
Oct 01, 2003 |
| Printed |
Page 48
|
Under "File Scope," the second sentence HAS BEEN CHANGED to the following:
A name with file scope can be used anywhere within a file after the point
where the name is declared.
|
Anonymous |
|
Oct 01, 2003 |
| Printed |
Page 48
|
Under "File Scope," the second sentence HAS BEEN CHANGED to the following:
A name with file scope can be used anywhere within a file after the point
where the name is declared.
|
Anonymous |
|
Oct 01, 2003 |
| Printed |
Page 56
|
Under "register," the following sentence:
The address-of operator (&) cannot be used with register variables.
HAS BEEN DELETED.
|
Anonymous |
|
Oct 01, 2003 |
| Printed |
Page 56
|
Under "register," the following sentence:
The address-of operator (&) cannot be used with register variables.
HAS BEEN DELETED.
|
Anonymous |
|
Oct 01, 2003 |
| Printed |
Page 93
|
In the second bullet item, the following HAS BEEN CHANGED before the period:
"in the base class and you plan to instantiate the derived class"
|
Anonymous |
|
Oct 01, 2003 |
| Printed |
Page 93
|
In the second bullet item, the following HAS BEEN CHANGED before the period:
"in the base class and you plan to instantiate the derived class"
|
Anonymous |
|
Oct 01, 2003 |
| Printed |
Page 94
|
Change the second bullet item to the following:
An abstract base class prescribes an interface to be implemented by a
derived class. A derived class may provide a definition for a member
function of the base class, declare the member function as pure virtual
itself, or not declare it at all. In the latter two cases, the derived class becomes abstract as well.
|
Anonymous |
|
Mar 01, 2007 |
| Printed |
Page 94
|
Change the second bullet item to the following:
An abstract base class prescribes an interface to be implemented by a
derived class. A derived class may provide a definition for a member
function of the base class, declare the member function as pure virtual
itself, or not declare it at all. In the latter two cases, the derived class becomes abstract as well.
|
Anonymous |
|
Mar 01, 2007 |
| Printed |
Page 94
|
Change the second bullet item to the following:
An abstract base class prescribes an interface to be implemented by a
derived class. A derived class may provide a definition for a member
function of the base class, declare the member function as pure virtual
itself, or not declare it at all. In the latter two cases, the derived class becomes abstract as well.
|
Anonymous |
|
Mar 01, 2007 |
| Printed |
Page 119
Section 'Exception Specification', 2nd line |
An exception is a guarantee to the caller of a function that only certain exceptions will be thrown
NOW READS:
An exception is a guarantee to the caller of a function that only certain exceptions can be thrown
|
Anonymous |
|
Mar 01, 2006 |
| Printed |
Page 119
Section 'Exception Specification', 2nd line |
An exception is a guarantee to the caller of a function that only certain exceptions will be thrown
NOW READS:
An exception is a guarantee to the caller of a function that only certain exceptions can be thrown
|
Anonymous |
|
Mar 01, 2006 |
| Printed |
Page 120
|
Change the fourth bullet item HAS BEEN CHANGED to read as follows:
If a virtual member function has an exception specification (see "Virtual
Member Functions"), the member function of a derived class that overrides
the function must have an exception specification that is either the same or
more limited than the one in the base class.
|
Anonymous |
|
Oct 01, 2003 |
| Printed |
Page 120
|
Change the fourth bullet item HAS BEEN CHANGED to read as follows:
If a virtual member function has an exception specification (see "Virtual
Member Functions"), the member function of a derived class that overrides
the function must have an exception specification that is either the same or
more limited than the one in the base class.
|
Anonymous |
|
Oct 01, 2003 |
