Errata
The errata list is a list of errors and their corrections that were found after the product was released. If the error was corrected in a later version or reprint the date of the correction will be displayed in the column titled "Date Corrected".
The following errata were submitted by our customers and approved as valid errors by the author or editor.
Color key: Serious technical mistake Minor technical mistake Language or formatting error Typo Question Note Update
Version | Location | Description | Submitted By | Date submitted | Date corrected |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Printed | Page xix The last line on the page did read |
http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/ethernet |
Anonymous | May 01, 2000 | |
Printed | Page xx The second line of the first paragraph in the Acknowledgments section |
"I would like to thank the inventor of Ethernet..." |
Anonymous | Mar 01, 2004 | |
Printed | Page 7 Sidebar, paragraph 1, line 2 |
change "1998" to "2000" Note from the Author or Editor: |
Anonymous | ||
Printed | Page 8 Table 1-1 |
10BASE2 is listed here as 802.3a-1985 and in 802.3, 2000 Edition, as 802.3a- Note from the Author or Editor: |
Anonymous | ||
Printed | Page 10 paragraph 2, line 3 |
"by the International Organization for Standardization, whose initials (derived from it's French name), are ISO." |
Anonymous | Mar 01, 2005 | |
Printed | Page 13 Paragraph 4, lines 3-4 |
delete "or not" Note from the Author or Editor: |
Anonymous | ||
Printed | Page 16 FOIRL, line 4 |
FOIRL is listed here as being published in 1989 but in 802.3, 2000 Edition, as Note from the Author or Editor: |
Anonymous | ||
Printed | Page 19 first sentence of the second paragraph |
The first sentence of the second paragraph did read: "Metcalfe understood..." |
Anonymous | Sep 01, 2000 | |
Printed | Page 22 third line of the first paragraph |
The third line of the first paragraph did read: "...two devices connected to a full-duplex Ethernet media system to simultaneously..." |
Anonymous | Sep 01, 2000 | |
Printed | Page 22 last line of the last paragraph |
The last line of the last paragraph did read: "...standard, probably operating at 10 Gbps, within..." |
Anonymous | Sep 01, 2000 | |
Printed | Page 24 3rd bullet |
In the 3rd bullet, "consists" HAS BEEN CHANGED to "consist". |
Anonymous | Mar 01, 2004 | |
Printed | Page 32 Lines 5-6 of the fourth paragraph |
Lines 5-6 of the fourth paragraph did read: "Each port of a repeater hub links individual Ethernet media segments together..." |
Anonymous | Sep 01, 2000 | |
Printed | Page 33 first line of the second paragraph |
The first line of the second paragraph did read: "...the individual ports combine segments..." |
Anonymous | Sep 01, 2000 | |
Printed | Page 45 first sentence of the fourth paragraph |
The first sentence of the fourth paragraph did read: "...numerically equal to or less than the maximum untagged frame size in octets of 1518 |
Anonymous | Sep 01, 2000 | |
Printed | Page 45 first sentence of the last paragraph |
This footnote has been added to the first sentence of the last paragraph: |
Anonymous | Jun 01, 2001 | |
Printed | Page 48 item 1, lines 4 and 6 |
change "each frame" to "successive frames" Note from the Author or Editor: |
Anonymous | ||
Printed | Page 50 3rd paragraph, line 1 |
change "length" to "lengths" Note from the Author or Editor: |
Anonymous | ||
Printed | Page 56 2nd paragraph, lines 1-2 |
change "the duplex configuration" to "the duplex configurations" Note from the Author or Editor: |
Anonymous | ||
Printed | Page 56 3rd paragraph, lines 2-3 |
change "detects collision" to "detects a collision" Note from the Author or Editor: |
Anonymous | ||
Printed | Page 58 5th paragraph, line 6 |
change "value of k (and hence, the range of the number r) exponentially Note from the Author or Editor: |
Anonymous | ||
Printed | Page 58 last paragraph on page 58 |
The final paragraph on page 58 states: "If the frame continues to encounter collisions after 16 retries, the interface will give up." In actuality, it is the 16th *attempt* that is the final allowable attempt, which is the 15th *retry*. Stating that 16 retries are allowed is equivalent to stating that 17 total attempts are allowed, which is not the case. Note from the Author or Editor: |
Anonymous | ||
Printed | Page 63 Figure 3-3 |
change "Frame start limit" to "Frame Burst Limit" Note from the Author or Editor: |
Anonymous | ||
Printed | Page 78 first line of the first paragraph |
The first line of the first paragraph did read: "...gap between each frame." |
Anonymous | Sep 01, 2000 | |
Printed | Page 83 2nd full paragraph, line 3 |
change "which is 46 bytes" to "which contains 46 bytes in the data field" Note from the Author or Editor: |
Anonymous | ||
Printed | Page 83 fourth line of the fourth paragraph |
The fourth line of the fourth paragraph did read: "...with this opcode in the first byte of the data field..." |
Anonymous | Sep 01, 2000 | |
Printed | Page 84 Figure 4-2 |
The MAC address in Figure 4-2 "PAUSE frame" did read: "01-08-C2-00-00-01" Now reads: "01-80-C2-00-00-01" |
Anonymous | Sep 01, 2000 | |
Printed | Page 88 1st paragraph under "FLP Operation," line 2 |
change "between each burst" to "between successive bursts" Note from the Author or Editor: |
Anonymous | ||
Printed | Page 101 The third line of the second paragraph used to read: |
"...that the Ethernet interface does not have..." |
Anonymous | Jun 01, 2001 | |
Printed | Page 110 The fifth line 5 of the first paragraph used to read |
"...to the Ethernet interface..." |
Anonymous | Jun 01, 2001 | |
Printed | Page 113 second to last line of the last paragraph |
The second to last line of the last paragraph did read: "...male jackscrews that connect..." |
Anonymous | Sep 01, 2000 | |
Printed | Page 113 last line on the page |
The last line on the page did read: "...of 0.5 meters..." Now reads: "...of 0.5 meter..." |
Anonymous | Sep 01, 2000 | |
Printed | Page 118 3rd paragraph |
You describe the drawback to Manchester encoding as: Note from the Author or Editor: |
Anonymous | ||
Printed | Page 127 2nd paragraph, line 1 |
change "The transmit and receive data signals..." to "The transmit or receive |
Anonymous | ||
Printed | Page 127-128 |
The last sentence in the last paragraph beginning on page 127 has been deleted. |
Anonymous | Jun 01, 2001 | |
Printed | Page 138 1st full paragraph, last line |
change "currents" to "potentials" |
Anonymous | ||
Printed | Page 152 Line 4 of the 3rd paragraph |
Under "Fiber Optic Cable" section there is the following sentence: |
Anonymous | ||
Printed | Page 167 first section heading |
Minor formatting: Note from the Author or Editor: |
Anonymous | ||
Printed | Page 171 Last Paragraph |
Text reads "providing a network with a total maximum cable diameter of 200 meters between stations" |
Anonymous | ||
Printed | Page 172 Table 12-1 |
Maximum segment length in feet for 1000BASE-SX was incorrectly listed as "220 m (1,351 feet)". |
Anonymous | Mar 01, 2004 | |
Printed | Page 173 Bottom of page the * foot note |
The Cisco catalyst 3500 XL switch appears to make use of a proprietary two Note from the Author or Editor: |
Anonymous | ||
Printed | Page 177 1st line |
change "e.g." to "i.e." Note from the Author or Editor: |
Anonymous | ||
Printed | Page 182 Table 13-2 |
In Table 13-2, the values should be aligned on the decimal points. Note from the Author or Editor: |
Anonymous | ||
Printed | Page 182 Table 13-2 |
In Table 13-2, the Max left end, middle segment, and right end enties for "Excess AUI" should read 4.92, not 4.88. Note from the Author or Editor: |
Anonymous | ||
Printed | Page 182 Table 13-2 |
Excess AUI, according to 802.3 Clause 7.4.3.7, can delay .1028 BT/m. This is Note from the Author or Editor: |
Anonymous | ||
Printed | Page 182 Table 13-2 |
Considering the margin of 0 to 5 bits, round to the nearest bit. Note from the Author or Editor: |
Anonymous | ||
Printed | Page 182 Table 13-2 |
For left and right ends, tabulate only _excess_ delay beyond the minima Note from the Author or Editor: |
Anonymous | ||
Printed | Page 184 bullet 3 |
change "0.5 meters" to "0.5 meter" Note from the Author or Editor: |
Anonymous | ||
Printed | Page 187 last paragraph, line 4 |
change "individual segment" to "individual segments" Note from the Author or Editor: |
Anonymous | ||
Printed | Page 189 Add the following to the footnote: |
"IEEE uses _c_ = 3.00 * 10^8 for Ethernet calculations." Note from the Author or Editor: |
Anonymous | ||
Printed | Page 189 footnote |
In the footnote, changed "...speed of light." to "...speed of light in vacuum." |
Anonymous | Sep 01, 2000 | |
Printed | Page 196 line 5 |
change "4.88" to "4.92" Note from the Author or Editor: |
Anonymous | ||
Printed | Page 196 paragraph 3 |
change "9.76" to "9.84" Note from the Author or Editor: |
Anonymous | ||
Printed | Page 196 5th paragraph, last line |
Does the fiber base delay value include an assumed 2. meters of AUI cable Note from the Author or Editor: |
Anonymous | ||
Printed | Page 196 5th paragraph should read |
100 m * .1026 bit time/m = 10.26 bit times Note from the Author or Editor: |
Anonymous | ||
Printed | Page 197 table 13-10 |
10BASE2 Left End should be 30.73 (using .1026 BT/m) or 30.72 (using 2/.65*30 Note from the Author or Editor: |
Anonymous | ||
Printed | Page 197 tables 13-10 and 13-11 |
Excess AUI should be 19.68 bit times, not 19.52. Note from the Author or Editor: |
Anonymous | ||
Printed | Page 197 tables 13-10 and 13-11 |
In tables 13-10 and 13-11, the excess AUI length total should reflect the corrections noted above for {182} and {196}. Note from the Author or Editor: |
Anonymous | ||
Printed | Page 197 table 13-11; |
"Quan. Three" should be "Quan. Four" Note from the Author or Editor: |
Anonymous | ||
Printed | Page 200 1st paragraph, lines 5 & 6; |
change "0.477 bit times" to "0.477 bit time" Note from the Author or Editor: |
Anonymous | ||
Printed | Page 229 Under the heading "Maintain the minimum bending radius" it did read |
"...four times the cable radius." |
Anonymous | Sep 01, 2000 | |
Printed | Page 231 The ninth line of the first paragraph |
"...are still considered..." |
Anonymous | Mar 01, 2004 | |
Printed | Page 232 first sentence in the second paragraph |
The first sentence in the second paragraph did read: "The optional wiring sequence is widely used in the United States, and many..." |
Anonymous | Sep 01, 2000 | |
Printed | Page 247 3rd paragraph |
There are a several ways to tell the difference between a normal, Note from the Author or Editor: |
Anonymous | ||
Printed | Page 249 paragraph 1, line 5 |
change "very" to "ultra" Note from the Author or Editor: |
Anonymous | ||
Printed | Page 257 The first sentence in the fourth paragraph used to read |
"...typically operates over multimode fiber using LED transmitters |
Anonymous | Jun 01, 2001 | |
Printed | Page 258 last line of the first paragraph |
The last line of the first paragraph did read: "10BASE-FX." Now reads: "100BASE-FX" |
Anonymous | Sep 01, 2000 | |
Printed | Page 280 fifth line of the third paragraph |
The fifth line of the third paragraph did read: "...only two devices at each end of a given link segment, which limits..." |
Anonymous | Sep 01, 2000 | |
Printed | Page 282 fourth line of the second paragraph |
The fourth line of the second paragraph did read: "...and two Class II repeaters..." |
Anonymous | Sep 01, 2000 | |
Printed | Page 294 The second sentence in the third paragraph: |
"This display provides the sum..." |
Anonymous | Mar 01, 2004 | |
Printed | Page 295 |
The first sentence of the last paragraph did read: "...shown on this port is nearly 30 percent of the number... rate for this port is around 30 |
Anonymous | Sep 01, 2000 | |
Printed | Page 295 third sentence of the last paragraph |
The third sentence of the last paragraph did read: "...(4,294,967,300 to be precise)." |
Anonymous | Sep 01, 2000 | |
Printed | Page 296 first sentence of the first full paragraph |
The first sentence of the first full paragraph did read: "Note that this port has counted over 3.4 billion total frames..." |
Anonymous | Sep 01, 2000 | |
Printed | Page 296 fourth line of the second paragraph |
The fourth line of the second paragraph did read: "...and then counted another 3.4 billion." |
Anonymous | Sep 01, 2000 | |
Printed | Page 296 sixth line of the second paragraph |
The sixth line of the second paragraph did read: "...collision rate is around 30 percent..." |
Anonymous | Sep 01, 2000 | |
Printed | Page 296 last two sentences of the third paragraph |
The last two sentences of the third paragraph did read: "Now the collision rate is less than 3 percent of the total frames. This is a much more |
Anonymous | Sep 01, 2000 | |
Printed | Page 313 The first two sentences of the last paragraph should be updated to read |
"A new 802.3ad link aggregation standard has been developed... This Note from the Author or Editor: |
Anonymous | ||
Printed | Page 339 4th paragraph, line 2 |
change "and by 100 for Gigabit Ethernet" to "and by 100 for (full-duplex) Note from the Author or Editor: |
Anonymous | ||
Printed | Page 355 The 6th line of the 2nd full paragraph |
"Some problems only seem to occur..." |
Anonymous | Mar 01, 2004 | |
Printed | Page 380-381 |
The IEEE standard for Ethernet is quoted as Note from the Author or Editor: |
Anonymous | ||
Printed | Page 402 last sentence in the first paragraph |
The last sentence in the first paragraph did read: "...maximum bend..." |
Anonymous | Sep 01, 2000 | |
Printed | Page 403 first paragraph of the sidebar |
In the first paragraph of the sidebar, in the sixth line, deleted "one vendor's set of" from the sentence. |
Anonymous | Sep 01, 2000 | |
Printed | Page 421 The third line of the second paragraph |
"silicon caulk...." |
Anonymous | Mar 01, 2004 | |
Printed | Page 445 Sixth paragraph |
BNC stands for Bayonet-Neill-Concelman, the last names of the people Note from the Author or Editor: |
Anonymous | ||
Printed | Page 445 Sixth paragraph |
Change "names of two designers of coaxial connectors" to "names of two Note from the Author or Editor: |
Anonymous | ||
Printed | Page 445 |
The BNC entry did read: "...Bayonet Neil-Concelman..." Now reads: "...Bayonet Neill-Concelman..." |
Anonymous | Sep 01, 2000 | |
Printed | Page 452 |
The third line of the MII entry did read: "...attach 802.3 interfaces (MACs) to..." |
Anonymous | Sep 01, 2000 | |
Printed | Page 453 |
The glossary entry for "PHY" HAS BEEN MOVED so that it occurs between "Phase Jitter" and "Physical Address." The entry for "Receive Collision" HAS BEEN MOVED so that it occurs between "Protocol" and "Repeater." |
Anonymous | Mar 01, 2004 | |
Printed | Page 460 Added the following term to the index |
"100BASE-T4, 18, 81" |
Anonymous | Sep 01, 2000 | |
Printed | Page 461 |
The entry for "10BROAD36" did read: "10BROAD36, 16" |
Anonymous | Sep 01, 2000 |