EXPERIENCE WITH EXPERT JUDGMENT: THE TU DELFT EXPERT JUDGMENT DATA
ROGER M. COOKE
Department of Mathematics, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands
LOUIS L.H.J. GOOSSENS
Department of Safety Science, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands
1 INTRODUCTION
The pros and cons of different weighting schemes remain a subject of research [1, 4]. The European Union (EU) contracted the TU Delft to review its applications both within EU projects, and elsewhere, in which experts assessed variables in their field of expertise for which the true values are known, in addition to variables of interest [3–6]. These are called seed, or calibration, variables. Since then, the TU Delft expert judgment database has nearly doubled. We now have studies involving over 67,000 experts' subjective probability distributions. The main sectors and summary information are given in Table 1.
The authors believe that this database represents a unique source from which much can be learned regarding the application of structured expert judgment in quantitative decision support. The entire data, appropriately anonymized, may be obtained from the first author. It is hoped that others will use this data to further develop methods for using structured expert judgment.
We assume that uncertainty is represented as subjective probability and concerns ...
Get Wiley Handbook of Science and Technology for Homeland Security, 4 Volume Set now with the O’Reilly learning platform.
O’Reilly members experience books, live events, courses curated by job role, and more from O’Reilly and nearly 200 top publishers.