References

  1. Adam, M. (2004). Why worry about theory-dependence? Circularity, minimal empiricality and reliability. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 18(2/3), 117–132.
  2. Agrawal, R. and Srikant, R. (1994). Fast algorithms for mining association rules. Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Very Large Data Bases, VLDB, 1215, 487–499.
  3. Amossé, T. (2013). La nomenclature socio-professionnelle: une histoire revisitée. Annales. Histoire, Sciences sociales, 4, 1039–1075.
  4. Anderson, C. (2008). The end of theory: The data deluge makes the scientific method obsolete. [Online]. Available at: http://archive.wired.com/science/discoveries/magazine/16-07/pb_theory [Accessed 11 May 2014].
  5. Andler, D. (2011). Le naturalisme est-il l’horizon scientifique des sciences sociales? In Les sciences humaines sont-elles des sciences?, Martin, T. (ed.). Vuibert, Paris, 15–34.
  6. Andrade, N. (2010). Technology and metaphors: From cyberspace to ambient intelligence. Observatorio (OBS), 4, 121–146.
  7. Anscombe, F.J. (1973). Graphs in statistical analysis. The American Statistician, 27(1), 441–475.
  8. Armatte, M. (2008). Histoire et Préhistoire de l’Analyse des données par J.-P. Benzecri: un cas de généalogie rétrospective. Electronic Journal for History of Probability and Statistics, 4, 1–24.
  9. Armstrong, D.M. (1993). A world of states of affairs. Philosophical Perspectives, 7, 429–440.
  10. Asur, S. and Huberman, B.A. (2010). Predicting the future with social media. [Online]. Available at: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1003.5699.pdf ...

Get Big Data now with the O’Reilly learning platform.

O’Reilly members experience books, live events, courses curated by job role, and more from O’Reilly and nearly 200 top publishers.