Imagine that you are implementing an interface of a class pets, and the compiler complains about the non-inclusion of bark method in your Cat class; strange, isn't it?
ISP suggests any interface of a class should not force the clients to include any unrequired methods by that client; in our example, Cat does not need to implement bark method, and it is exclusive to Dog class:
The preceding diagram depicts ISP violation and how to get rid of the same by splitting the <<IPets>> interface to represent the Cat and Dog interface explicitly.
