 |

My Trip to Europe
Poor Tim! His column is entitled "Ask Tim." He is
confined to answering
questions put to him by readers. My column is cleverly called "Frankly
Speaking." I don't have to wait for a question; I can write about whatever
I want. And this week, I want to write about Europe.
I'd never been to Europe before my trip to our European offices last month.
I was much impressed with Europe, and our European offices in particular.
Having seen the environment, I understand the differences between Europe
and the USA much better than before.
Many of you read Thomas Scoville's OSS
Europe: Open Source Over There article on open source software and
Europe that appeared on the O'Reilly web site recently. Scoville says
that Europe is more attuned to open-source style development and gives some
reasons for their predilection: cost-consciousness, a fear of depending too
much on US/corporate/Microsoft products, high ideals in education, even
(gasp!) an underlying, nearly socialist, sense of community. I found the
same phenomenon: love of Linux and other open-source development efforts is
rampant.
I found several European characteristics that I would add to Scoville's
list. Europeans respect their objects and don't throw them out. There is a
preservationist streak in Europe that is unknown in the "use it and toss
it" USA. It's different from the American conservationist emphasis on
recycling. Europeans don't need to recycle; they just care for and keep on
using the same things. Consequently, machines that are gathering dust in
the rec rooms of US homes are still cranking out code in Europe. Linux,
Apache, and other efficient open-source products run well on these
underpowered but efficient machines. Office 2000 probably won't.
"Little" is a concept that is still valued and respected in Europe. In
Paris, I stayed in the smallest hotel room I'd ever seen. The whole room
would fit into the anteroom of most Marriotts in the US. The shower and
sink were in one tiny cell; the toilet was in a tinier cell next to it. (I
now understand where the term "water closet" came from.) Yet the room was
comfortable and efficient. Everything I needed was nearby (very nearby).
Furthermore, I was just a short distance from Notre Dame, St. Germaines Des
Prés, and the O'Reilly office. My hotel room occupied little space,
but it
valued the space it had. (As Spencer Tracy said of Katherine Hepburn in the
movie Pat and Mike: "Not much meat on her, but all of it is
cherce.") Open-source technology values the space it uses, and each
technology strives to do one thing well. It allows you to build a system
that contains just what you want, not what the developers of the technology
want you to want.
And the Europeans accept chaos and know how to live with it. I came away
from France believing in the strong faith of the French people, not because
of their magnificent cathedrals, but because I saw them drive around L'Arc
du Triomphe. As they careened around this monument in vehicles that were
little more than motorized Altoid containers, they looked like a network
run by Linux servers: little packets hurtling within inches of each other,
traveling together for a time, separated by other packets coming from other
sources, reassembling as they sped out of the circle and onto the Champs
Elysées. It's no surprise to me that much of the interest in IPv6 is
coming
from France -- if they don't understand delay-sensitive traffic in France,
they understand it nowhere.
I was in the French
office the Friday that the first copies of Open
Sources: Voices of the Open Source Revolution showed up. The effect of
the arrival of this book was electrifying. Before the day was out,
plans were underway to translate the essays into French. By the following
Wednesday, when I returned to the States, a first draft translation of one
of the essays was in my email, completed by an intern in our French office,
Sebastien Blondeel, over the weekend. This book represents more than just a
product to them; it espouses a philosophy that they believe in. Their
excitement gave me a new perspective on this book. From a company
perspective, I knew that the book was important to us and to the open
source movement; but I didn't foresee its power to move people, to express
what they believed and wanted to see adopted by the computing community.
Similarly, the German office was
abuzz with new open source software books
and proposals. I've written before about the books on Qt (available now in
Europe, and in April in the USA) and KDE (now being translated from
German to English) coming from our German office. And, of course, our
Linux Network
Administrator's Guide was written by Olaf Kirsch
(albeit with a US editor). I found out, though, that there are several
other good projects underway in this area. Our European editors have found
the kind of
authors that have always produced the best O'Reilly books: committed
authors, people who use and love the technology they write about. These
authors want royalties, sometimes, and recognition as well; but mostly they
want people to understand why the software they use and probably help
develop is important and powerful; and they want to improve the world by
making powerful software easy to learn and use.
Scoville's prediction that open-source technology may find its most
nurturing home in Europe is very possible, in my view. We're certainly
finding a lot of knowledgeable and committed authors there. We're also
rediscovering that spirit that can turn a book on a prosaic technical topic
into a document of importance and urgency. It's present in all the authors
and technical reviewers of all the great books we've done, wherever those
authors and reviewers live; but it took a trip to Europe for me to
see it afresh.
Frank Willison
Editor-in-Chief
Return to: Frankly Speaking

|
 |