Errata


Print Print Icon

Submit your own errata for this product.


The errata list is a list of errors and their corrections that were found after the product was released. If the error was corrected in a later version or reprint the date of the correction will be displayed in the column titled "Corrected".

The following errata were submitted by our customers and approved as valid errors by the author or editor.


Color Key: Serious Technical Mistake Minor Technical Mistake Language or formatting error Typo Question



Version Location Description Submitted By Corrected
Printed Page 13
In the first paragraph, second line, the wrong word is used. It now

reads:

"...connected but always..."

Should read:

"...connected and always..."

Anonymous 
Printed Page 21

There is a spelling error in the 5th point from bottom. It now reads:

"...formatted interace with..."

Should read:

"...formatted interface with..."

Anonymous 
Printed Page 26

In paragraph 6, line 5, the wrong word is used. It now reads:

"72 lines..."

Should read:

"72 characters..."

Anonymous 
Printed Page 27
In paragraph 2, there is a confusing point in the discussion for

splitting lines: The first occurrance of the string is "naturally" wrapped
at the same point that the second one is manually split. The following
footnote should be added to this line:

"Note that this line is wrapped by the page layout, but that the
reader should consider it to be unbroken when reading the example."

Anonymous 
Printed Page 28

The last sentence of paragraph 6 now reads:

"If it is present, it should reflect the actual author of the message."

It should read:

"If it is present, it should reflect the person (or program) who
actually sent the message on behalf of the author."

Anonymous 
Printed Page 30

The last sentence of paragraph 4 now reads:

"The real author is represented in the Sender header and the person
or program that actually sent the message is represented in the From
header."

It should read:

"The real author is represented in the From header and the person or
program that actually sent the message is represented in the Sender
header."

Anonymous 
Printed Page 31
In the sample conversation, there is a line missing.

The SMTP DATA portion must be ended with a period (.) by itself on a
line (followed by CRLF as line delimiter, of course), in the first
column of the line. This line is not printed in the sample
conversation. The correct way would be:

the message.
. << This '.' is currently missing.
250 (etc)

Anonymous 
Printed Page 31
The message at the bottom of the page is missing the 'To' header field.

CORRECTION: Change the last sentence of paragraph 3 from:

"Similarly, the To header gets written..."

to:

"The MTA knows the message recipient from the RCPT TO: line. This
means that the message recipient is in the envelope, but there is no
matching To: header in the message."

Anonymous 
Printed Page 33
The example telnet session is missing linebreaks. Two linebreaks

should be inserted in the line beginning with 'Date:' after "+0400"
and another linebreak after "action.", so that it looks like this:

Date: Fri, 32 Feb 1492 09:53:43 +0400

Testing of the Date header from a user action.
.

Anonymous 
Printed Page 47
Code in middle of page

"plus paces" now reads "plus spaces"
"values of 0-31..." now reads "values of 1-31"

Anonymous  Mar 2000
Printed Page 49
Paragraph 4

Paragraph 4 reads:

"An octet is subtly different from a byte. An octet is
8 bits, where the earlier bits in the stream represent the
most significance. This is called 'big-endian' and is the
Internet standard order, called the 'network standard byte
order'. A byte (8 bits), on the other hand, may be
interpreted in one of two ways, big-endian or little-endian,
and the manner of local interpretation is system dependent.
Some computer systems use little-endian, where the earlier
bits are interpreted as being the lower-order bits.
Obviously, if you are on a little-endian system, encode a
bit stream directly and send it to a big-endian system,
the byte stream will not be correctly interpreted.
Therefore, all bit streams must be converted to the network
standard big-endian order (which yields an octet stream),
prior to applying any type of MIME encoding."

and should be changed to read:

"An octet stream is subtly different from a bit stream.
An octet is 8 bits, like an 8-bit byte. The earlier octets
in the stream represent the most significance. This is
called 'big-endian' and is the Internet standard order,
called the 'network standard byte order'. An 8-bit byte
stream, on the other hand, may be interpreted in one of two
ways, big-endian or little-endian, and the manner of local
interpretation is system dependent. Some computer systems
use little-endian, where the earlier bytes are interpreted
as being of lower-order. Obviously, if you are on a little-
endian system, encode a bit stream directly and send it to
a big-endian system, the stream will not be correctly
interpreted. Therefore, all bit streams must be converted
to the network standard big-endian order (which yields an
octet stream), prior to applying any type of MIME encoding."

Anonymous 
Printed Page 49

Paragraph 4 has been changed to read:

An octet stream is subtly different from a bit stream.
An octet is 8 bits, like an 8-bit byte. The earlier octets
in the stream represent the most significance. This is
called 'big-endian' and is the Internet standard order,
called the 'network standard byte order'. An 8-bit byte
stream, on the other hand, may be interpreted in one of two
ways, big-endian or little-endian, and the manner of local
interpretation is system dependent. Some computer systems
use little-endian, where the earlier bytes are interpreted
as being of lower-order. Obviously, if you are on a little-
endian system, encode a bit stream directly and send it to
a big-endian system, the stream will not be correctly
interpreted. Therefore, all bit streams must be converted
to the network standard big-endian order (which yields an
octet stream), prior to applying any type of MIME encoding.

Anonymous  Mar 2000
Printed Page 49
Rule 4 now makes reference to Rule #2 instead of Rule #1.

Anonymous  Mar 2000
Printed Page 50
Removed the "=" from the code list.

Anonymous  Mar 2000
Printed Page 51
In the 2nd chunk of code, the lines now wrap as follows

"And it should be the law: If you use =
the word 'paradigm' without knowing
what the dictionary says it means,=
you go to jail. No exceptions.
=3D=3D> David Jones"


Anonymous  Mar 2000
Printed Page 52

First sentence on the page now reads:

"An equals sign that is neither followed by two
hexadecimal characters nor at the end of a line"...

Added the following to the end of the 1st "base64" paragraph:

"Base64 encoding is described in RFC 2045."

Anonymous  Mar 2000
Printed Page 53
base64 encoding table

Changed the number to the left of the letter 'm' to read '38'

Anonymous  Mar 2000
Printed Page 56,57
The bottom of page 56, top of page 57. The sample strings of

characters should be in constant-width font.

Anonymous 
Printed Page 74
The last sentence of the second paragraph from the bottom of the page

should read:

"S/MIME uses algorithms which are restricted to weak (40-bit)
cryptography outside of the United States for the time being.
This is due to export restrictions imposed by the United States
government."

A new paragraph should be added immediately after the above, which should
read:

"Both OpenPGP and S/MIME are affected by export restrictions on
cryptographic products and algorithms. PGP's international version
(by some, though not all, accounts started by an improper export)
gives OpenPGP a head start on developing a system of more than
40-bit encryption across international borders."

Anonymous 
Printed Page 79
Second paragraph from the bottom

The last two sentences have been changed to read:

"It uses the application/x-pkcs7-signature protocol for digital
signatures and either the SHA.1 or MD5 cryptographic algorithms
for message integrity checks. The micalg parameter is therefore
set to either 'sha1' or 'md5'."

Anonymous  Mar 2000
Printed Page 123
Inserted this sentence at the end of 2nd paragraph


"In this case, the MTA determined my user name
via identd, the IDENT daemon. A discussion of
identd is best left to its own documentation."

Anonymous  Mar 2000
Printed Page 125
Code block in middle, Line 4

Server: 050....
now reads:
Server: 250....

Anonymous  Mar 2000
Printed Page 136

Changed the last 3 sentences of paragraph 2 to read:

"A server typically responds by spawning a new thread or
a copy of itself (a fork) to handle each new connection.
These threads or copies are either destroyed or returned
to a pool when a session completes. In this way, a
server can handle many requests from a single application."

Anonymous  Mar 2000
Printed Page 137-138
Figures 10-1 and 10-2,

"POP tp TCP Port 110"
now reads:
"POP to TCP Port 110"

Anonymous  Mar 2000
Printed Page 142
In the last sample on the page

<pid.clock@hostname.domain
now reads:
<pid.clock@hostname.domain>

Anonymous  Mar 2000
Printed Page 143
Code in middle

First line now reads:
Client: APOP mmouse c4c9334bac560ecc979e58001b3e22fb

Anonymous  Mar 2000
Printed Page 146
RETR example

Client: RETR
now reads:
Client: RETR 2

Anonymous  Mar 2000
Printed Page 150
Figure 10-3

Changed the result of the STAT from
"+OK 1 320" to "+OK 1 340".

Anonymous  Mar 2000
Printed Page 153

Changed the last 3 sentences of paragraph 2 to read:

"The server responds by either spawning a thread or forking
a copy of itself to handle the new request. The session
handler sends a banner greeting to the client and awaits
further commands from the client. Each IMAP command is
discussed in detail in this chapter."

Anonymous  Mar 2000
Printed Page 155
In the first line, "The Log out State" should be changed to "The Logout

State."


Anonymous 
Printed Page 163
Some explanation of the "~" in the SUBSCRIBE example (7th line from

bottom of page) should be given, at least for the Win32 users.

For example, you could insert a paragraph immediately following the SUBSCRIBE
example which reads:

"Note that the '~' character used in the mailbox name is used under
Unix and Unix-like operating systems to refer to a user's home
directory."

Anonymous 
Printed Page 164
In the 2nd to last paragraph, change "A SUBSCRIBE command is then

use to mark" to "... is then used to mark..."

Anonymous 
Printed Page 168
EXPUNGE example

Line 3 now reads:

S: * 10 EXPUNGE

Anonymous  Mar 2000
Printed Page 169
In Table 11-8, the DELETED key has a surplus character: "DELETED>"

should be "DELETED".

Anonymous 
Printed Page 172

In the IMAP FETCH example, the server tag returned should read
"DF56", not "a127".

Anonymous 
Printed Page 172

In the paragraph under the IMAP FETCH example, the phrase "It
returned the date" should read "It returned the data".

Anonymous 
Printed Page 173
The example for UID FETCH

Line 2 did read:
Server: * 1 FETCH (FLAGS (Answered Seen))
now reads:
Server: * 1 FETCH (FLAGS (Answered Seen) UID 90)

Anonymous  Mar 2000
Printed Page 176
Figure 11-2

Right side, near bottom; line did read:
* 3 FETCH (BODY[TEXT] {60}
now reads:
* 3 FETCH (BODY[TEXT] {62}


Anonymous  Mar 2000
Printed Page 191
2nd line from bottom

did read:
...NOT EQUAL "Email"...
now reads:
...NOT EQUAL "Contact.Email"...


Anonymous  Mar 2000
Printed Page 198
ACAP Sessions" second sentence.

"A client initiates an IMAP session..."
now reads:
"A client initiates an ACAP session..."

Anonymous  Mar 2000
Printed Page 201
1st line of code

did read:
gzip -d [modulename].tar.gz tar xvf [modulename].tar
now reads:
gzip -d [modulename].tar.gz; tar xvf [modulename].tar

Anonymous  Mar 2000
Printed Page 201
3rd line of code

did read:
perl Makefile.PL make make test make install
now reads:
perl Makefile.PL ; make ; make test ; make install

Anonymous  Mar 2000
Printed Page 202
In the second line under the heading "Reading an Entry," change "fllow"

to "follow."

Anonymous 
Printed Page 277
Line 10 from bottom

did read:
if ($attachment_list) >0){
now reads:
if (($attachment_list) >0){

Anonymous  Mar 2000
Printed Page 280
In the code, the comment "# Create the encoded content string, starting

with the # newly-created MIME header" should either be in two lines (the
second line starting "# newly-created..." or one line without the second '#'.


Anonymous 
Printed Page 281
Line 9 from bottom

did read:
$encode_table[(((vec($decoded_attachment...
now reads:
$encode_table[((vec($decoded_attachment...
(removed one "(")

Anonymous  Mar 2000
Printed Page 287
In the code, "#fflush socket..." should read "# flush socket...".


Anonymous 
Printed Page 289
In the third line under "Sending MIMEi Email via Java," change

"shorted" to "shorter."

Anonymous 
Printed Page 298
First paragraph, 3rd sentence

"The getpts line in..."
now reads:
"The getopts line in..."

Anonymous  Mar 2000
Printed Page 298
3rd line from bottom

did read:
Synopsis: $0 [-u] [-l <length>] [-f <file>
now reads:
Synopsis: $0 [-u] [-a] [-d] [-l <length>] [-f <file>]"

Anonymous  Mar 2000
Printed Page 306
Middle of page

Line did read:
print NEWBOX $pline, "
";;
now reads:
print NEWBOX $pline, "
";

Anonymous  Mar 2000
Printed Page 325
In the first line of the 2nd full paragraph, change "it is makes" to

"makes."


Anonymous 
Printed Page 325
In the 4th line of the 5th full paragraph, change "did notlist" to "did

not list."


Anonymous 
Printed Page 330
Paragraph 4

Paragraph 4, sentance 4 should read,

"This approach seemed to have promise, but has not worked
out as well as some have hoped. This is due primarily
to the fact that the RBL is based upon IP addresses,
blocking the orginating mail server (often an Internet Service
Provider). According to the RBL rules for inclusion, only
those ISPs who operate an open mail relay will be blacklisted.
Unfortunately, this includes both those supporting spam and
those who are incapable or unwilling to restrict mail relaying
via their servers. The RBL thus both reduces spam and generates
much abuse from many of those banned.

The remainder of the orginal paragraph should be deleted.

Anonymous 
Printed Page 330

4th paragraph, 4th sentence now reads:

This approach seemed to have promise, but has not worked
out as well as some have hoped. This is due primarily
to the fact that the RBL is based upon IP addresses,
blocking the orginating mail server (often an Internet Service
Provider). According to the RBL rules for inclusion, only
those ISPs who operate an open mail relay will be blacklisted.
Unfortunately, this includes both those supporting spam and
those who are incapable or unwilling to restrict mail relaying
via their servers. The RBL thus both reduces spam and generates
much abuse from many of those banned.

The remainder of the orginal paragraph was deleted.

Anonymous  Mar 2000
Printed Page 341
RFCs 2425/2426 are listed in reverse order.

Anonymous 
Printed Page 348

Second column, eighth entry should be changed to
include line breaks between the ten MIME types listed there.

Anonymous 
Printed Page 348
8th entry in list

Added line breaks between the 10 MIME types listed.

Anonymous  Mar 2000
Printed Page 352
Added the following entry to the table

Site URL Description
-----------------------------------------------------------
ACAP Home Page http://asg.web.cmu.edu/acap/ Information on and
Implementations of the ACAP protocol.

Anonymous  Mar 2000
Printed Page 354
In the entry for MTA, change "deliverying" to "delivering."

Anonymous