The errata list is a list of errors and their corrections that were found after the product was released. If the error was corrected in a later version or reprint the date of the correction will be displayed in the column titled "Date Corrected".
The following errata were submitted by our customers and approved as valid errors by the author or editor.
| Version |
Location |
Description |
Submitted By |
Date submitted |
Date corrected |
| Printed |
Page iv
the author's last name (Ballew) was misspelled as "Ballow," and |
the editor's last name (Loukides) was misspelled as "Loukades"
|
Anonymous |
|
Apr 01, 1998 |
| Printed |
Page iv
At the top of the copyright page, changed the author's name from "Ballow" |
|
Anonymous |
|
Oct 01, 2000 |
| Printed |
Page xiii
Added the following information to the Preface, at the end of the "We'd |
Like to Hear from You" section:
"We have a web site for the book, where we'll list examples, errata,
and plans for future editions. You can access this page at:
http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/9781565923201/
For more information about this book and others, see the O'Reilly
web site:
http://www.oreilly.com"
Also, in the third paragraph, changed "techncial" to "technical."
|
Anonymous |
|
Oct 01, 2000 |
| Printed |
Page 8
Figure 1-4: the first bit of the Class Address (the gray box to |
the left of the box labeled "Network") changed from "1" to "0"
To view the corrected Figure 1-4, return the to main errata page and click
on the "Figure 1-4" link.
|
Anonymous |
|
Jul 01, 1998 |
| Printed |
Page 10
|
part of line 17 should read:
we get 1024 subnets of 16384 hosts each.
|
Anonymous |
|
Apr 01, 1998 |
| Printed |
Page 11
para. 3, line -3: Spacing error fixed: "In (too much space) |
addition to their own unique..."
|
Anonymous |
|
Apr 01, 1998 |
| Printed |
Page 57
In the paragraph that breaks across pps. 56 & 57, the sentence |
that reads:
"Routers establish broadcast domains, which are portions of a network
within which a broadcast is seen by all machines."
was changed to:
"Routers establish broadcast domains, which are portions of a network
within which a broadcast is seen by all machines (a single IP network,
in the case of TCP/IP)."
|
Anonymous |
|
Apr 01, 1998 |
| Printed |
Page 58
|
the first paragraph, third line reads:
"... if you replace all of your 4 Mb PS Token ..."
that was changed to:
"... if you replace all of your 4 Mbps Token ..."
|
Anonymous |
|
Apr 01, 1998 |
| Printed |
Page 59
the opening question in the second complete paragraph (starts |
with "Okay, the broadcast problem is solved...") now reads:
"Okay, the broadcast problem is solved, but how do we allow the hosts
in one broadcast domain to talk to the hosts in another?"
(138, 139: reprinted to accommodate the changes made to 140 and 141)
|
Anonymous |
|
Apr 01, 1998 |
| Printed |
Page 70
|
Figure 3-5: For Router2, the entries now read:
172.16.0.0/22 R1
172.16.64.0/24 R1
172.16.65.0/24 --
172.16.66.0/24 --
172.16.67.0/24 --
172.16.112.0/24 --
172.16.113.0/24 R3
And for Router3:
172.16.0.0/22 R2
172.16.64.0/22 R2
172.16.112.0/24 --
172.16.113.0/24 --
|
Anonymous |
|
Sep 01, 1999 |
| Printed |
Page 103
Table 4-3: in all occurances of "ns" the "n" was changed to the |
|
Anonymous |
|
Jul 01, 1998 |
| Printed |
Page 136
Figure 6-1: the second number of each IP address was changed |
from "168" to "16", so that the numbers are now 172.16.48.0/24,
172.16.50.0/23, 172.16.49.0/24, and 192.16.0.0/24.
Also, the segment connecting Router1, Router2, and Router3 together
was labeled 172.16.32.0/24, the segment above Router1 was labeled
172.16.33.0/24, and the segment above Router2 was labeled 172.16.34.0/24.
To view the corrected Figure 6-1, return the to main errata page and click
on the "Figure 6-1" link.
|
Anonymous |
|
Jul 01, 1998 |
| Printed |
Page 136
Figure 6-1 did show: 192.16.0.0/24. |
Now reads: 192.168.0.0/24.
|
Anonymous |
|
May 01, 2000 |
| Printed |
Page 140
|
The code now reads:
router ospf 1
network 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 area 0
! redistribute my static routes with a type-2 external metric of 1
redistribute static metric 1
! originate a default route if I have one
default-information originate
!
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.100.250
Also, the following paragraph was added to the end of the section (top
third of pg 141):
Because I wished to propagate a default route into the OSPF routing
domain, I had to include the <typewriter-text>default-information
originate</typewriter-text> statement in the configuration. Unlike
RIP, OSPF treats the default route as a special case in the IOS.
Without this additional statement, the default route, regardless of
its source, will not be injected into the OSPF routing domain. If you
only wish to propagate non-default static routes, you do not need this
statement.
|
Anonymous |
|
Apr 01, 1998 |
| Printed |
Page 142
|
Line 8 did read:
"172.16.101/24"
now reads
"172.16.101.0/24"
|
Anonymous |
|
Sep 01, 1999 |
| Printed |
Page 167
|
Error in the sample configuration: where the example read:
"redistribute igrp 71" and "distribute-list 12 out igrp 71", it now
reads "redistribute eigrp 71" and "distribute-list 12 out eigrp 71".
|
Anonymous |
|
Apr 01, 1998 |
| Printed |
Page 242
|
10th line of first paragraph did read:
"192.168.101.0/255"
now reads:
"192.168.101.0/24."
|
Anonymous |
|
Sep 01, 1999 |
| Printed |
Page 283
Replaced the tail of the first paragraph from |
"Fortunately, really dangerous denial of service..."
with:
"For example, one current denial of service attack
called "SMURF" (see http://www.quadrunner.com/~chuegen/
smurf.txt for details and the latest defenses) is nearly
impossible to trace to the true perpatrator without the
cooperation of network engineers at each step of the way.
Without a good relationship with your peer engineers (and
they with theirs), the best you can hope to do is ride it
out."
|
Anonymous |
|
Sep 01, 1999 |
| Printed |
Page 293
|
The 3rd line from the bottom of the page, which reads:
"dialer-list 1 protocol ip list 27"
Should be accompanied by the following note from the author:
"Versions of the IOS prior to 10.3 required an alternate form of this
command that reads 'dialer-list 1 list 27'. This applied equally to
all protocols that were supported for dial-on-demand routing. In
versions of the IOS that support both commands, Cisco has indicated
that the newer format is preferred and should be used for all new
installations."
|
Anonymous |
|
|
| Printed |
Page 293
|
The third line from bottom did read:
"dialer-list 1 protocol ip list 27"
Now reads:
"dialer-list 1 list 27"
|
Anonymous |
|
May 01, 2000 |
| Printed |
Page 293
|
The 3rd line from the bottom of the page did read:
"dialer-list 1 list 27"
Now reads:
"dialer-list 1 protocol ip list 27"
We were unable to fit the accompanying note by the author on the page:
"Versions of the IOS prior to 10.3 required an alternate form of this
command that reads 'dialer-list 1 list 27'. This applied equally to
all protocols that were supported for dial-on-demand routing. In
versions of the IOS that support both commands, Cisco has indicated
that the newer format is preferred and should be used for all new
installations."
|
Anonymous |
|
Oct 01, 2000 |
| Printed |
Page 311
The Asia Pacific Network Information Centre was referenced by its |
former Tokyo address. Since then, they have moved to Australia (August 1998),
and the new address is:
Asia Pacific Network Information Center, Pty. Ltd.
Regional Internet Registry for the Asia-Pacific Region
Level 1 - 33 Park Road.
PO Box 2131
Milton QLD 4064
Australia
The address:
"ip-request@rs.apnic.net"
now reads:
"ip-request@apnic.net."
The web site remains the same at "http://www.apnic.net/."
|
Anonymous |
|
Sep 01, 1999 |
| Printed |
Page 336
Colophon: last para., second to last line, changed "Robert Romano" |
|
Anonymous |
|
Jul 01, 1998 |