Errata for SQL and Relational Theory
Submit your own errata for this product.
The errata list is a list of errors and their corrections that were found after the product was released. If the error was corrected in a later version or reprint the date of the correction will be displayed in the column titled "Date Corrected".
The following errata were submitted by our customers and approved as valid errors by the author or editor.
Color Key: Serious Technical Mistake Minor Technical Mistake Language or formatting error Typo Question Note Update
| Version |
Location |
Description |
Submitted By |
Date Submitted |
Date Corrected |
| Printed |
Page 228
Section "Relational Completeness," (lines 5-6). |
The "i.e.," should not be split over two lines.
|
scottd_oreilly |
Apr 01, 2009 |
|
| Printed |
Page 310
Fig. C.4 |
The SUC (suppliers with an unknown city) relation should contain the rows S2, S4 to match the SC relation in Fig C.2 on p. 309.
|
John.Gallagher |
Jul 21, 2012 |
|
| Printed |
Page 398
Index entry for bi-implication |
The subentry "SQL, 43" should be moved as a subentry to the index for BOOLEAN.
|
scottd_oreilly |
Apr 01, 2009 |
|
| Printed |
Page 398
Index entry for BOOLEAN |
The subentry "vs. truth, 178" should be moved as a subentry to the index entry for consistency.
|
scottd_oreilly |
Apr 01, 2009 |
|
| Printed |
Page 399
Index entry for Faroult |
The first name should be Stephane, not Stpehane.
|
scottd_oreilly |
Apr 01, 2009 |
|
| Printed |
Page 400
Index entry for logical difference |
The word passim should be in italics.
|
scottd_oreilly |
Apr 01, 2009 |
|
| Printed |
Page 401
Index entry for predicate, subentry for relational expression. |
The page numbers should be 122-123.
|
scottd_oreilly |
Apr 01, 2009 |
|
