The Art of SQL
by Stephane Faroult with Peter Robson

The following errata were *corrected* in the 5/08 reprint:

Here's a key to the markup:
	[page-number]: serious technical mistake
	{page-number}: minor technical mistake
	<page-number>: important language/formatting problem
	(page-number): language change or minor formatting problem
	
	
{40}  Table 2-2;
Table 2.2 does not agree with the commentary.  The table says that squeeze1/squeeze3
= .86/.39 (= 2.2), and squeeze1/squeeze2 = .86/.48 (= 1.8), but the commentary say
squeeze3 is 1.8 times as fast, and squeeze2 is 2.2 times as fast.  Either the table
or the commentary is backwards.

AUTHOR'S RESPONSE:
THE TEXT IS CORRECT,
THE TABLE ISN'T.

I have rerun the test (I still have the scripts). The fastest routine
(by a small margin) is actually squeeze2.
The times in table 2-2 have been permuted and there should be 0.39
seconds for squeeze2 and 0.48 seconds for squeeze3.


{92}  Last line of first SQL example;
"and a.ordered >= somefunc"

should read

"and o.ordered >= somefunc"