Errata

Building Maintainable Software, Java Edition

Errata for Building Maintainable Software, Java Edition

Submit your own errata for this product.

The errata list is a list of errors and their corrections that were found after the product was released. If the error was corrected in a later version or reprint the date of the correction will be displayed in the column titled "Date Corrected".

The following errata were submitted by our customers and approved as valid errors by the author or editor.

Color key: Serious technical mistake Minor technical mistake Language or formatting error Typo Question Note Update

Version Location Description Submitted By Date submitted Date corrected
, Printed, PDF, ePub, Mobi, , Other Digital Version
Page x
2nd paragraph

Eight out of 10 of them are are derived

'are' repeated twice

Note from the Author or Editor:
Page x, second paragraph, last sentence
Original: "Eight out of 10 of them are are derived.."
should be
"Eight out of 10 of them are derived..."

 Aurélien Pupier  Apr 08, 2016 
, Printed, PDF, ePub, Mobi, , Other Digital Version
Page xix
bit.ly link

The bit.ly/building_maintainable_software link should refer to:
http://shop.oreilly.com/product/0636920049159.do

 Sylvan Rigal
Sylvan Rigal
 		 Aug 04, 2016 
, Printed, PDF, ePub, Mobi, , Other Digital Version
Page 8
Third donut chart in Figure 1-1

The third donut chart in Figure 1-1 should be the same as the third donut chart on page 26 (Java edition)/page 27 (C# edition), thus with the caption: "unit size quality profile cut-offs for a 4-star system". The cut-offs are thus (from low risk to high risk):
57%
21%
15%
7%

 Sylvan Rigal
Sylvan Rigal
 		 Aug 04, 2016 
Printed, PDF, ePub, Mobi, , Other Digital Version
Page 12
Code snippet

Note that since the code snippet on page 12 is an example of a bad practice, it also includes a SQL injection flaw. This is not elaborated upon because the focus of the exercise is to assess the code's maintainability.

 Sylvan Rigal
Sylvan Rigal
 		 Nov 07, 2016 
Printed, PDF, ePub, Mobi, , Other Digital Version
Page 16
2nd paragraph

So far our unit contains only four lines of code
should be
So far our unit contains only six lines of code

as ending brackets count as well, too.

Note from the Author or Editor:
p.16, second paragraph:
Original: "So far our unit contains only four lines of code"
should be
"So far our unit contains only six lines of code"

Note: Since closing brackets count as well.

 Anonymous  Feb 08, 2016 
, Printed, PDF, ePub, Mobi, , Other Digital Version
Page 26/40/64/76
Donut chart legends

For clarity and consistency with the threshold tables, the highest categories in the donut chart legends should read:
-Figure 2-2 (Java p.26/C# p.27) should be "61 or more" instead of "61+". The orange category in the second/third charts of this figure should read "31-60" instead of "30-60".
-Figure 3-2 (Java p.40/C# p.42 ) should be "26 or more" instead of "25+"
-Figure 5-1 (Java p.64/C# p.66) should be "7 or more" instead of "7+"
-Figure 6-1 (Java p.76/C# p.80) should be "51 or more" instead of "51+"

 Sylvan Rigal
Sylvan Rigal
 		 Nov 07, 2016 
, Printed, PDF, ePub, Mobi, , Other Digital Version
Page 35
Bottom line

The developer much choose
should be
The developer must choose

Note from the Author or Editor:
p.35, bottom line
Original: "The developer much choose"
should be
"The developer must choose"

 Anonymous  Feb 08, 2016 
, Printed, PDF, ePub, Mobi, , Other Digital Version
Page 37
code snippet

Note that on p.37 (§3.2) we purposely leave the +else+ line in the code snippet to improve code analyzability (that is, removing the +else+ line would not change the code's behavior). The effect of this added line should be marginal to the actual code maintainability. Also, for the sake of consistency we apply the same coding style as in the code snippet before refactoring.

Sylvan Rigal
Sylvan Rigal
 		 May 17, 2016 
, Printed, PDF, ePub, Mobi, , Other Digital Version
Page 57
Second code snippet

No need for the line
Point position = r.getPosition();

since position is not used in the unit.

Note from the Author or Editor:
P.57, second, refactored code snippet: the following line:

Point position = r.getPosition();

is superfluous since the position variable is not used in the unit.

 Anonymous  Feb 08, 2016 
, Printed, PDF, ePub, Mobi, , Other Digital Version
Page 79
Figure 7.1

The right title: the loosely coupled components -> highly coupled components: hard to test.

Note from the Author or Editor:
P.79, figure 7.1
The right title is erroneously the same as the left one.

It should read: Highly coupled components: hard to change in isolation.

 Filip Rotsaert  Apr 15, 2016 
Printed, PDF, ePub, Mobi, , Other Digital Version
Page 115
last paragraph

...assumes that if the hour of the day on a 24-hour clock is lower than 6 p.m., it is night
-->This should be "lower than 6:00, it is night"

Sylvan Rigal
Sylvan Rigal
 		 Mar 12, 2018