Blogs
Tags > OOXML
Rikipedia: stuff deleted from Wikipedia - Ken Krechmer on OOXML Standardization - Both ODF and OOXML only support flexibility, but adaptability is better?
By Rick JelliffeSeptember 1, 2009
I found that that an interesting section Ken Krechemer had contributed to the Wikipedia article on the Standardization of OOXML had been deleted for being an editorial. Anyway, I hope Ken doesn't mind me taking the liberty of reprinting it here.
Experiments with numbering and horizontal rule in AbiWord - Grumpy old guy thinks word processing was better 15 years ago
By Rick JelliffeSeptember 1, 2009
One thing it demonstrates, I think, is the fallacy that presentation-driven user interfaces are easier to use or implement than structured document editors: and they look like becoming adequate for interchange only with great difficulty. Show me the tags!
Key Fraunhofer study released on ODF and OOXML
By Rick JelliffeAugust 21, 2009
It says "It may be concluded that many of the functionalities, especially those found in simpler documents, can be translated between the standards, while the translation of other functionalities can prove complex or even impossible." I say "The lack of support for plurality almost guarantees acrimony, and winners and losers."
Simplistic conversion from word proccessor formats to plain text is unsafe - OOXML, ODF, HTML
By Rick JelliffeAugust 17, 2009
There are a number of ways in which text can be introduced, changed or disappeared, though each format will have a different mix of possibilities.
Mircrosoft and the two XML patents #2 - More on the I4i patent for Word's custom XML
By Rick JelliffeAugust 13, 2009
Here is a better overview of the i4i patent.
Microsoft and the two XML patents
By Rick JelliffeAugust 12, 2009
Microsoft has been in the news in the last month in relation to two patents, one it received and one it has been ordered to pay $200 million in damages for infringing. I've been looking through both, and the patents seem to bear little resembles to their reports.
Should OOXML be a national standard? - Strict OOXML: probably not; Transitional OOXML: surely not?
By Rick JelliffeAugust 11, 2009
There is no inconsistency in ajudging that a particular technology would be usefully written up as an international standard but yet not appropriate for a national standard.
Microsoft's proposed resolution to EU on competition
By Rick JelliffeJuly 28, 2009
I like the clearer and more objectively verifiable commitments.
Documents as miniature websites? - Plus: Legislation needed to protect and promote FOSS
By Rick JelliffeJuly 22, 2009
The most likely future for documents and their formats, is that each document will start to look/act/be implemented more and more like a tiny, self-contained website. There is a flip-side: as documents become more like tiny websites, the desktop application will become more become more like a browser with an internal web-server.
Survival of the fit-for-purposest
By Rick JelliffeJune 25, 2009
At first I was afraid, I was petrified
The conspiracy to save OOXML from being so crappy
By Rick JelliffeJune 19, 2009
According to my balance principle, I would say that SC34 WG1 needs more participation from (non-MS) vendors to get a good balance: it is currently tipped in favour of users/governments/standards bodies.
Groklaw is on-message
By Rick JelliffeJune 14, 2009
Waiting on this wintery Sydney day for my flatmate's Chinese roast pork knuckle with bamboo to cook, I thought I'd check up on a suspicion that had formed in my mind: had Growlaw ever published anything on OOXML/ODF recently that was not just Big Blue's message of the week?
Supporting degradation: towards a workable Open Packaging standard
By Rick JelliffeJune 1, 2009
I think we are missing, or have now arrived at the stage where we need, a way to declare relationships between different namespaces in standard XML documents. This needs to be part of a broadly-based open packaging standard.
The limits of standards in OOXML and ODF office suites
By Andy OramMay 20, 2009
Nobody expected Microsoft to make its proprietary OOXML format really work with products that support ODF. But an office suite has to hook into a huge number of outside pieces in its environment. We're just going to have to live with a fuzz factor.
Where everyone knows your name: ODF 1.1 formula support in Office SP2
By Rick JelliffeMay 8, 2009
Aslightly interesting standards aspect to the ODF 1.1 interoperability problems that MS Office SP2 is caught up in. To my mind either the problem is in the short term only and intrinsic to the ODF feature, or the problem does not lie with Microsoft for making their choice, nor with other implementers for making their choices, but with the ratty choice of markup used for this feature in ODF 1.n itself.
SmartArt and OpenOffice.oo
By Rick JelliffeMay 6, 2009
I was happy to see Thorsten Behrens' blog entry SmartArt Import and More. Thorsten works on the graphics engine for OpenOffice's presentation application Impress.
The big fish swallow the little fish: Adobe's FXG and MicroSoft's OOXML
By Rick JelliffeMay 6, 2009
Adobe's FXG seems to be to PSD what OOXML is to .DOC: a re-factoring of a middle-aged binary format in XML with a focus on fidelity rather than elegance. My working model is that we need to think of the de-proprietarization of market-dominating technologies in the intensely pragmatic model of a sequence of bigger fish swallowing smaller fish: a sequence of consolidation of dialects, modularization of parts, then adoption into pluralistic frameworks and Adaptability Standards, allowing user selection of winning mini-technologies. Each stage of which will take at least a major software release cycle.
Blue Sun? What an IBM acquisition of Sun means for software
By Kurt CagleMarch 24, 2009
However, Sun's software side of the acquisition ledger, especially by IBM, has been rather oddly overlooked, given that it will likely have major implications for software development and cloud computing for years. Sun's software holdings cover five primary areas - Java, Solaris, mySQL, Open Office, and Sun's recently acquired QLayer cloud infrastructure. Understanding how IBM could potentially ramp up (or destroy) each of these gives some interesting insight into the real value of IBM's potential software acquisitions.
Master Blaster
By Rick JelliffeMarch 20, 2009
Peter Sefton has had a great series of blog entries in which he has managed to blast almost everyone in the office document space:
Document security and macros
By Rick JelliffeFebruary 26, 2009
One of the big selling points of descriptive markup is that it is safe. If you use a binary format (or a macro-enabled file) you can have a security problems. I think ODF needs to take a leaf out of OOXML's book here, and at least adopt the convention where the normal extensions must be opened by conforming applications with macro- and script- and event- disabled. Security is so important, that it should be part of ODF 1.2 rather than a next-generation ODF issue.
No real technical barriers...
By Rick JelliffeFebruary 23, 2009
I enjoyed this quote in Charles Babcock's 'Why Windows must go Open Source'
Safe Plurality: Can it be done using OOXML's Markup Compatibility and Extensions mechanism
By Rick JelliffeFebruary 13, 2009
The particular issue that MCE address is this: what is an application supposed to do when it finds some markup it wasn't programmed to accept? This could be extension elements in some foreign namespace, but it could also be some elements from a known namespace: the case when a document was made against a newer version of the standard than the application.
Conformance classes should mirror stakeholder usage clusters
By Rick JelliffeFebruary 4, 2009
It seems that both ODF and OOXML have reached the stage where the killer bee of conformance is buzzwording itself around the ears of the various committees. ... So what do I mean by a stakeholder usage cluster? From the vendor/developer side, you have needs for different levels of development effort. From the user side, you have needs for reliable interchange at different levels of complexity
OOXML and Nicotine
By Rick JelliffeJanuary 23, 2009
Is Microsoft evil in the way that Big Tobacco is evil? That is the flavour of some comments I have been reading recently: X works for Microsoft therefore that is enough to discredit their opinion on moral grounds alone. But software does not give you cancer.
ISO standard 'office' formats overpromise compatability?
By Rick JelliffeNovember 22, 2008
A friend in the industry who works with ODF gave me a heads-up about a new Gartner report, available on Microsoft's site which he describes as "delusional". Of the three pages, I pretty much agree with their first and third pages. Towards the middle it gets a little, err, nutty to me.
Fake real-time blog from JTC1 Meeting, Nara, Japan
By Rick JelliffeNovember 21, 2008
ISO/IEC JTC1 (the international standards body that looks after Information Technology standards) has just published two documents from its recent meetings in Nara, Japan. Along with the publication of IS29500 today, these represent a kind of line being drawn underneath the OOXML episode. JTC1 also addresses the "one standard" issue but needs to go further on reform of accelerated processes like the contentious "fast-track" submission.
OOXML standards finally published and available free!
By Rick JelliffeNovember 21, 2008
I am delighted to see that the free site for ISO publicly available standards finally has the OOXML standards available:
Fake real-time blog from Document Interoperability Initiative 2 at Redmond
By Rick JelliffeOctober 29, 2008
Can Microsoft's idea of "document archetypes" and "interoperable templates" be ramped up to provide a fresh new approach to both better document interoperability and better descriptive markup?
Trying to figure out where Open Formula fits in
By Rick JelliffeOctober 24, 2008
OpenFormula actually defines an exchange formula language which has explicit delimiters, but also allows (and partly defines) application-specific user interface languages, which allows spaces and other delimiters. An ODF spreadsheet that used IS29500 syntax when saved, even if it didn't follow full Open Formula, would not be conforming.
Is ODF the new RTF or the new .DOC? Can it be both? Do we need either?
By Rick JelliffeOctober 22, 2008
Is ODF the new RTF or the new .DOC? Can it be both? I suggest that perhaps the looming challenge for document standards is not in deciding or developing perfect formats, but in integrating the packaged world of documents with the fragmented world of web resources. ...First, a potted history of the document format landscape over last 25 years...
Ken Krechmer's Adaptability Standards
By Rick JelliffeOctober 10, 2008
I think Ken Krechmer's Adaptive Standards pre-suppose the kind of frameworking and support for modularity and plurality that I have been banging on about for the last decade. An interesting recent quote from him.
How many mavericks does it take to change a lyspære?
By Rick JelliffeOctober 7, 2008
Thirteen members of the Norwegian standards body's technical committee walked out recently... If we take these 13, and subtract people who either work for competitors of Microsoft or affiliated with the NUUG/FOSS industry/community, we get...1 person (the esteemed Steve Pepper) by my count...
The state of the art?
By Rick JelliffeSeptember 12, 2008
The problem is that the bottom line for document interoperability is not the format, but the feature match of the applications. The only way ever to get reliable, bottom-line interchange (enough fidelity that no semantics are lost, with graceful degradation) is by restricting feature use.
Plan A, Plan B, Plan C, Plan D, the CONSEGI Declaration, and the Brazilian suppression
By Rick JelliffeSeptember 11, 2008
I think that underneath the IT bigwigs' comments is the ghost of Plan A: an avoidance of responsibility by procurement or policy makers by invoking the authority of ISO as the reason why a standard should be adopted as a strategy to disentangle from Microsoft and go open source. However, since that was a dodgy proposition to start with (i.e. the invocation, not the disentangling), withdrawing it actually withdraws nothing.
The Education of Gary Edwards
By Rick JelliffeSeptember 8, 2008
One of the more interesting characters in the recent standards battles has been Gary Edwards: he was a member of the original ODF TC in 2002 which oversaw the creation of ODF 1.0 in 2005, but gradually became more concerned about large vendor dominance of the ODF TC frustrating what he saw as critical improvements in the area of interoperability.
Is Office Suite Markup worth the trouble?
By Simon St. LaurentAugust 25, 2008
In his Extreme "first person" talk yesterday, Patrick Durusau asked some of the right questions about the recent explosive battles over standardizing XML generated by Microsoft Office and OpenOffice.org. I can't share his conviction, though, that getting through this firefight...
A standards-based expert system for detecting structures and annotating XML-in-ZIP documents
By Rick JelliffeAugust 19, 2008
One of the projects I have been working on recently has been a proof-of-concept system to allow a rules-base approach to automatically classifying and annotating XML-in-ZIP documents. The approach we have taken is to use Schematron, using the report elements rather than the assert elements.
OOXML appeals fail to convince National Bodies on Technical Management Board
By Rick JelliffeAugust 19, 2008
On Friday last week, the ISO/IEC JTC1 Technical Management Board (comprised of various National Bodies) narrowly declined to forward the OOXML appeals of India, Venezuela, Brazil and South Africa to a Conciliation Panel. Despite some comments around the place, the appeals process is not necessarily over.
The challenge of validating XML-in-ZIP file in place: how to do it with Schematron
By Rick JelliffeAugust 11, 2008
Thoughts on Schematron headers for processing ODF and OOXML, with a C# URL Resolver that handles ZIP files like some Java resolvers. The new XML-in-ZIP documents present a new challenge: constraints that formerly would have been kept in a single document are now split into multiple documents. When the basic information is kept in a single XML file, validation is reasonably straightforward.The current range of schema tools support these kinds of intra-document invariants quite well. But no document is an island, so Schematron also supports a range of intra-document constraints, but it may be time to enhance it to support the XML-in-ZIP issues better.
1 to 39 of 39
